Kazaa Settles With Music Industry For 100 Million
The following article was originally posted over at MTV.com:
Kazaa has become the latest rogue downloading service to settle with the music industry.
The Recording Industry Association of America announced on Thursday (July 27) that the peer-to-peer network reached an out-of-court settlement with the major music companies to settle international litigation against the operators of Kazaa brought in the U.S. and Australia.
Kazaa's owner, Sharman Networks, has agreed to pay the world's four major record companies — the EMI Group, Sony BMG Music Entertainment, Universal Music Group and Warner Music Group — more than $100 million, according to a spokesperson for the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry, which brought the action along with the RIAA. Under the terms of the settlement, Kazaa will also introduce filtering technology that will ensure it doesn't distribute copyright-infringing music or movie files in the future.
"This is welcome news for the music community and the legal online music marketplace," said RIAA Chairman and CEO Mitch Bainwol in a statement. "Steadily but surely, we are passing another important marker on the remarkable journey that is the continuing transformation and development of the digital marketplace."
The Motion Picture Association of America announced simultaneously that it has also settled litigation against Kazaa owner Sharman, whose FastTrack network it had previously called the "leading unlawful peer-to-peer file-trading" system.
Since the Supreme Court ruled against peer-to-peer networks Grokster and Streamcast in 2005, saying that companies that promote copyright infringement can be held liable, the days of rogue P2P systems appeared to be numbered. In addition to Grokster going legit, over the past year such services as iMesh and Bearshare have settled with the RIAA, as have other services in Taiwan and Korea.
"A little more than a year ago, the U.S. Supreme Court struck a wise balance between protecting innovation and the rights of creators," Bainwol said. "This meaningful decision has helped bring legal and moral clarity to the marketplace. Services based on theft are going legit or going under, and a legal marketplace is showing real promise."
Last year, the Federal Court of Australia found Kazaa's operators guilty of authorizing widespread copyright infringement. At its peak, Kazaa, one of the most popular P2P networks, had 4.2 million simultaneous users worldwide, according to the RIAA statement. In May 2003, Sharman declared Kazaa the most downloaded software ever, at 239 million downloads.
What's Next?
- Previous Article:
Sick Of It All To Perform 20th Anniversary Show - Next Article:
Threat Signal Release E-Card
9 Comments on "Kazaa Settles With Music Industry For 100 Million"

2. writes:
The bands are gonna get screwed but that's what they signed on for...the artist who really benefit are the ones who are independent. It really does suck that their was a 'need' for this-fans should respect are artist enough to pay for their work so they can create more art. Nobody rides for free-or should be asked to...

3. writes:
What sucks more than the RIAA actually existing is the fact that it was created in the first place.
I blame it on the population problem and the fact that there're not enough jobs, so random people have to invent new things to do like monitor the "legal" rights of bands.
Some laws and those things illegal that follow are utter bullsh**. Hence the reason the law enforcing particular action is transgressed so often (i.e. downloading music, smoking pot, bangin' hookers, etc.). If you personally see the law as foolish you'll consider it inconsequential and repeatedly break it (part of the reason jails and short-term prison inmates are "revolving door" cases - in/out/in/out/in/out...).
Obviously Kazaa's operators consider the RIAA to be foolish, but in the end it's paying up or potential jail time... neither are appealing but one is less so than the other.
I own 300+ hardcopy cd's, I'm not a download fiend - but I do d/l music so as to avoid buying a crappy record (something neither worth the cost of a cd these days, or worth being sued by the RIAA for - could also be considered auditory abuse / noise pollution) on a whim.
f*** the RIAA and all their main-stream artists attempting to cash in. f*** the radio and all their R&B, hip-hop, pop garbage which isn't worth paying for anyhow.
Artist's rights are important, don't get me wrong, but piracy is bigger than that.
I bet there's some retarded, genre-specific artist who's shaking in their boots right now simply because they're afraid of a day job, possibly because they're not multi-faceted enough to possess any other talents besides writing un-realistic love songs.
Either way - this time the RIAA wins.


5. writes:

6. writes:
DeathInEye/Jimmy-
So my question to you guys-as an unsigned artist or let's just say Korn-is after I've bought the software, paid for studio space, hired other musician, paid for instruments, took the time to create the music-why exactly is it okay for anyone to download it and give it away when I paid for it?
7. writes:
First: Where does Kazaa get 100 million and remain a functioning institution?
Second: f*** the RIAA for attacking people for downloading music...The RIAA is positively gigantic...and it's coming down on little computer-illiterate homemakers with 13 year old sons who don't even know they're breaking the law....
Kazaa's creators should be held accountable, but not it's users.
The bands/artists get ripped off from all angles...even from their fans who download illegally.
RIAA is a bully. Downloaders are petty theives. The bands are victims.

8. writes:
Right on RM-
The problem I have is with the 'fans' who think its okay to give away someone else's art. Obviously labels/RIAA &RE venture Capital and no one likes them but to use that logic to justify stealing is lame. If you can afford a computer you can afford a dollar.

9. writes:
First Off: If YOU'RE paying for EVERYTHING then you're not a big enough artist to even possibly reap benefits from Kazaa going out of business. Second Off: Any good business oriented person would realize Kazaa and other downloading programs/websites are a little thing called PROMOTION. Thirdly: Artists get next to nothing from their music, the label does. Artist make 80-90% of their money from selling merch touring, which you can make YOURSELF. Also, have you ever heard of home-recording?
To minimize comment spam/abuse, you cannot post comments on articles over a month old.
Member
1. Vayne Theories writes:
Id like to know how much each band is gonna recieve. And how they come to those figures.