Metallica Writing Material For New Album
Band Photo: Metallica (?)
In a recent interview with Tabloid!, Robert Trujillo, the bass player of American heavy metal legends Metallica, revealed that the band has begun work on the next studio album. An excerpt from the interview in which he discusses new material reads as follows:
Tabloid!: In terms of new music, your last album, Death Magnetic, was out in 2008, and you have been touring heavily with that. Are you currently working on new material?
Trujillo: "We've been busy writing and recording. We've got a couple of new songs we have been working on the past couple of weeks. The writing process for the new Metallica album has begun. We've been in the studio with Rick Rubin, working on a couple of things, and we're going to be recording during the most of next year. We've got a lot of work ahead of us. But the great thing is that we have sort of already jumped off the launch pad and we're swimming. It's happening. It's reality. It's a lot of fun, there are a lot of ideas, and we're really excited about the new record. For me, personally, Death Magnetic was the launch pad for the next record. This is the beginning of something very, very cool."
Read the full article at GulfNews.com.
What's Next?
- Previous Article:
Kreator To Enter The Studio In January - Next Article:
Annex Theory Posts Tour Recap Video
95 Comments on "Metallica Writing New Material"
Senior News Correspondent
2. writes:
I was reading a really good article yesterday about it would actually benefit Metallica to stop trying to gain metal cred and just sell out. Here it is if anyone's interested.
http://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2011/10/metallicas-lulu-problem-why-dont-they-just-sell-out-again/247295/
Member
3. writes:
I disagree with EVERY SINGLE WORD of that article.
This was obviously written by a fan of the black album which I never was nor will be.
To say Met wasn't the best thrash band of the 80's???
People will always have their favs.
But as far as I'm concerned...
sorry but were it not for Met there wouldn't have been thrash movement.
Nothing can touch their first four albums period.
Cliff dying is what ruined this band.
Hopefully Lars and James will pull their heads out of their a$$es and let Trujillo write some of the material.
The thing that worries me most is them working with Rubin again.
Work with Sneap and get a decent sounding album.
Sneap.
Colin Richardson.
Hell, get Rob Flynn, new MH sounds awesome.
The only thing about that article I agreed with is that yes, they DO have a good album left in them.
A thrash album, not the beer chugging, frat boy crap they started crapping out after Justice.
Member
Member
Member
7. writes:
8. writes:
They just need to shove off and die already. It's like watching a hourse be flogged to death after the AJFA album. Seriously, just stop. You guys suck, you've got all the money you could ever want, please, just save our ears! Oh, and Lulu is probably going to be a fail at least frmo what I can gather in the previews.
Member
9. writes:
so sick of people trashing metallica. as a metal head i will always give them a chance. i relate personally with james and the rest are great musicians...and yes put alote more into ROBERTS hands. james is getting more and more cleaner with his vocals...im not a fan of btw. so fellas sit down and review the first 4 albums and build from that style. dethmagnetic was good but lets get some more aggression please....AMERICAN METAL HEADS ARE p***ed OFF THESE DAYS...give us something to relate too.
Member
10. writes:
Why bother? I'll explain, but, you'll all have to bare with me here, this is going to be a difficult concept to understand.
Some people actually have an opinion that is different than your's! Believe it or not, your opinion isn't the only one that matters!
I know it's tough but maybe someday you'll understand. Metallica still sells out shows with thousands upon thousands of attendees, so obviously there are a few people out there who actually DO want to hear a new album.
If everyone at your workplace thought your job was worthless and irrelevant, yet your employer still paid you to do it and you enjoyed it, would you quit because of what your co-workers thought of you? I think not.
Senior News Correspondent
12. writes:
"im so sick of people kissing these has beens asses"
Two comments so far have said they want Metallica to die along with such other comments as "nobody cares" and "What's the point?" Pretty much every metal website and forums slates Metallica. So, who exactly is kissing their ass?
Member
13. writes:
I'm not kissing anyone's ass. All I'm doing is pointing out the obvious which people always seem to have such a hard time with.
Besides, if people really didn't care, they wouldn't be getting so butthurt about a band they don't like still existing. Personally, I don't click on news related to things I don't care about.
14. writes:
i liked death magnetic! was it a great metal album? no! but it was a solid album that sounded much better than almost all other radio bands out there. talica is not young p***ed off teens anymore and its time to move on and stop expecting them to recreate what once was. i agree they can do much better and hopefully robert can get more pull. magnetic was much better than black for crying out loud. and st. anger sucked but it was quite thrashy in my opinion. i hope they drop this lou bs and put out another album as good as magnetic at least. and even if they dont i wont be wining about it because maching fvcking head is still around!
Member
15. writes:
Maybe they're writing now right after Lulu because they know that no one really likes it so they're trying one last ditch effort to save themselves. I think if they just look because at how they used to be and what they are now they'd realized they fvcked up lol. Just my thoughts.
Either way as sad as I am about it I'll give them ONE more chance when whatever this is comes out. I think they need to bring back that old aggression, and I think bring in some influences from a more modern stand point.
Or they could literally do whatever the hell Testament did, because whatever it was it worked because The Formation Of Damnation was awesome heh heh.
Member
16. writes:
ZMA: IMHO, one big reason that Testament has improved over the years, is they got rid of Louie Clemente long ago and got better drummers. Louie wasn't bad, but he played the basics. Hoglan, Tempesta, Dette, and Bostaph have served Testament very well over the years. Metallica would do good to take note. ;)
17. writes:
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
25. writes:
I don't care what anybody says. I'll listen to everything Metallica releases until either I, or they, are dead. This Lou Reed crap, and it IS crap, is STILL Metallica, even though it sounds like a lazy Metallica cover band playing while a raving derelict rambles over it. I'm not a die hard Metallica fan, but I can listen to any of it because I like Metallica. Even St. Anger. Although I'm rarely in the mood for it, when I am, St. Anger hits the mark. Sometimes I love to hear loud sh**ty drums and nonsensical lyrics without getting up to put in a Mars Volta CD.
Member
Member
27. writes:
As much as I like the guy, Robert can say whatever he wants about the new album. Let me hear something, then we'll talk.
#25 Believe me when I say, "No disrespect". To each his own, but I will never understand that mindset. However much I might have loved the band at one time, they, and I have moved on. They play good music they get my money. They play bad, not so much.
28. writes:
I don't know if Metallica can still write good music given that the riffs and drumming were pretty lousy on Lulu but at least the next album won't feature Lou Reed. That'll make it at least 5 times better than Lulu. If they do a record with Ozzy though, it'll make it 100 times better than Lulu.
29. writes:
Good, I'm glad there'll be a new one. I'm also glad for the senseless flame war between that one Megadeth fan and the four Metallica fans. It's funny - I didn't consider Load and its sequel to be a sell-out - since they could have sold more records with another Black album - but that still doesn't mean I liked them. Load in particular I just can't stand. Who cares? Some people like it. Others are not forced to listen to it. Not even prisoners of war, they got the earlier ones forced upon them in what has got to be the worst idea in the long history of torture ideas. St. Anger is pretty bad. And yet, without being a crazed fanboy, I'd still take it over anything Megadeth has done post Countdown (f*** Youthanasia, yes) or anything Slayer has done post Seasons (not that Divine Intervention was terrible, but it was just another substandard album in the sea of such). It sounded fresh, unlike the aforementioned bands output. Death Magnetic. on the other hand, was nowhere near as bad as its predecessor, so I like it fairly well. Which brings us to Lulu. Well, Lulu isn't a Metallica record. Not even in the "not 100% Metallica" sense, it's not in the "100% not Metallica" sense. I've some respect for Lou Reed (Velvet Underground), but this was just awful - getting Metallica to play some throwaway songs while he...well, it's not even talk-singing, is it?...spurts vaguely poetic lyrics (not a compliment) over them. It's not just forgettable, it's freakin' annoying to suffer through the whole of it. Wishes for the new one: 1) shorter songs or more riffs per song 2) get a better producer or do it yourselves 3) write a song for Mustaine - it's only fair, he's been writing songs about you for so long now :)
Writer, Reviewer
31. writes:
Heh, well this new album statement was a good way to get attention away from the Lulu album, which is bringing them nothing but bad press before even being released. Smart move. I'm going to go ahead and assume Metallica saved their real chops for this album rather than the Lulu one. Also a smart move. The only move that wasn't so smart here it seems is actually attempting to sell this Lulu bollocks and bothering to release it at all. Should've been buried and forgotten the first time they heard it.
Member
Member
Supporter
35. writes:
if metallica want commercial sucess they should listen to bullet for my vocalist and become an emo band. I hope they don't, Im hoping they just call it quits after some shockingly bad musical efforst and go their seperate ways. I also hope that Lars never ever plays drums again, because he sounds like he is trying to hump a drumkit not play one.
Metallica havent been what i would call a thrash band since 90-91. Megadeth and Slayer have overtaken them by miles and even Anthrax, a band i love but is often thought of as the weakest of the big 4, have released some strong albums compared to load, reload, etc... Metallica are getting by because of their past, and if st anger and lulu are anything to go by they dont have much of a future.
Sorry boys but your headbanger cards have been revoked, please leave your instruments at the door and go remember the good ol days of the 80's
Member
Member
39. writes:
kinda sounds as if they are trying to get fans back on their good side. right after LULU begins its downward spiral even before its out, they announce they are making new music. hopefully they are writing their obituaries on this album as well, because their career has died with LULU!!
Member
40. writes:
^ not really, Branded. The fanbase Metallica now has took St. Anger alright, so they'll accept this one "cos it's the project with Lou Reed", not an actual Metallica album.
But, they're around to keep that money machine rolling.
To prove a point, let's have a look at Metallica's latest live DVDs as Metallica surely knows what their fans want (what sells):
"Français Pour Une Nuit" live DVD.
19 tracks and I count 4 post 1997 tracks. A bit weird for a live set released in 2009, no?
"Orgullo, Pasión, y Gloria: Tres Noches en la Ciudad de México",
released in 2009 as well has 4 post 1997 tracks.
The "Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria",
Metallica live DVD released last year has 3 post 1997 tracks.
SO, Metallica has gone the Rolling Stones path and focuses only on the Classics, releasing some kind of whatever that sounds kinda like Metallica every 4-5 years.
AND being a classic band is no excuse! When Pink Floyd released their final live album "Pulse", it had 24 tracks and 8 of the tracks were off their latest 2 albums, so there you go!
Anyway, I've said enough. I'm done with Metallica.
Member
41. writes:
I think I have to thank the Lulu travesty for opening my eyes. Up until the Lulu propaganda machine began, I’ve held on to this blind hope that Metallica would recapture the magic of their glory years. St. Anger gave a glimmer of hope that they wanted to create something different than the Load of sh** they released is the 90’s. Death Magnetic even made it feel like another step was taken toward their thrash metal roots. However, with all the press lately, I dug in a little deeper and came to the realization that the Metallica glory years are long gone and will NEVER return.
With the First four albums, we saw a young hungry band growing. Ride the Lightning incorporated some thematic elements and song craft that Kill ‘em All lacked. Master of Puppets built on that and added another layer of power and unchecked aggression. And Justice for All expanded on the progressive metal element and took it as far as they could go. Between AJFA and the black album two key things changed.
1. They had received a taste of success. The “One” video undeniably exposed them to a larger market. Their Damaged Justice tour lasted longer than previous tours due to demand.
2. With the grunge movement on the horizon, Metallica were savvy enough to see the writing on the wall. IF they wrote another AFJA style, the market would not be there to support it. But Metallica had reached the mountaintop and they wanted to stay there.
Enter Satan to produce their 5th album. They removed the obtuse progressive element and wrote simpler songs with a hard edge but accessible verse chorus song structures and added lyrics people could identify with yet still feel rebellious about. Bobtallica had a formula that would prove financially successful. Retread that format two more times, with a publicity machine that forcefed it to the masses and they could comfortably rest on their laurels.
There’s the problem. They are comfortable. They don’t have the same hunger and passion they used to. They are now middle aged rockers. Sure they have their problems/issues and whatnot, but their financial security and social circle doesn’t reward them for getting mean and angry. Frankly, I don’t think they want to be ‘that’ band anymore. Also, with their age, I’m not sure they could pull it off physically – at least not Lars. When listening to St. Anger and Death Magnetic, the drums don’t have the inventiveness, nor the athleticism from their glory years. Gone is the double bass. The odd-time patterns are also absent. (think the 7/8 time on the AJFA title track). Out of all of them, Lars has the least fire left. The guitar work from DM has its moments, but the strong thrash riffs just aren’t there. The old Metallica is gone and never coming back folks.
Now should they up and quit as some have suggested? Whether they should or shouldn’t is a matter of opinion. If I was in their shoes, I’d still go on. Why would I turn my back on my success? Is it ruining a legacy? The damage is already done there, yet that damage is subjective. They’re marketing to a small metal and a larger non-metal audience. Guess which one pays the bills? They’re not going away. Metallica is going to milk the machine they’ve built until its dry, or they die - whichever comes first.
Writer, Reviewer
Member
Member
45. writes:
Kudos Drum J! I enjoyed reading that. I agree,i long ago gave up thinking Metallica could ever return to the style of thier glory years,83-90. They've become a legacy act,no differant than the Rolling Stones or whoever. Theres nothing wrong with that,theres a demand for it. People want to go to thier shows,hear them perform Creeping Death or Battery,etc,relive how great that stuff was 25 years ago. The Metallica brands still got alot of clout,they still are a huge live draw!
Member
46. writes:
Nice work friends...I agree with your insights and perceptions
Big R, I understand that it is all nice and fuzzy for the noob-boobs to go to the junkshow and feel like 'they were there', rocking out to shoddy renditions of the classics...yep, good for them ;)
As an Old Guardsman, like you, I find it IMPOSSIBLE to feel ANY inclination to pay these fvcks money to see them play a bunch of their rocker CRAP, peppered with jam type medley hack jobs of the glory tracks of old...and complete the shoody deal with a crowd of fvcking modern 'Sh!talli-goons'....nah, thanks
I've been tryin to tell y'all for a while now that these dudes are fvcking toast, but I guess the proof is in the fecal pudding eh?
Supporter
Member
Member
50. writes:
Drum_Junkie, there must be some sort of odd connection here because the words that came out of your head, onto your keyboard, is almost verbatim to what I was thinking but to lazy and fed up to write.
Because it's not like that'll actually take anyone's advice and ever try to expand on their sound. That's why this is the last chance I'm giving this band. Once I listen to this album it'll decide weather or not I stick around in the Metallica camp. I already got one foot out the door.
They honestly don't even have to go thrash or back to their old roots as some have said. I'd be happy just have something remotely heavy with some modern influences. That's how a lot of bands have survived and thrived. Judas Priest is a prime example of that.
But when I say modern influence it's not like I'm saying I want see a "metalcore" Metallica or anything of that nature. Metal has changed over the past 40 years and I believe it'd satisfy the masses to see them take some of the more modern influences of today and sort of mold that into a sound "similar" to their old sound. I say similar because as it was pointed out by DJ, those glory days are over.
Also I think if Lars just took a fvckin' lesson to get a little better it'd get a lot of people off their back. Because lemme put it to you this way:
Paul Mazurkiewicz (Cannibal Corpse) 43 years old
Neil Peart (Rush) 59 years old
Scott Travis (Judas Priest) 50 years old
Dave Lombardo (Slayer) 46 years old
Lars Ulrich (.........Metallica) 47 years old
Member
51. writes:
Now look at that list of drummers. All of them are exceptional players who are up there in the years but still rip up the skins. So why is a guy like Paul and Dave better then Lars? Maybe because they actually give a sh!t? Who knows. They still seem to have the spark that makes their drumming fun to watch. And they always try to push their limits.
I mean god even Gene Hoglan is 44 and he's a drum machine. The man was probably invented deep underground by Nazi scientists decades ago as some super weapon but he escaped and found drums as a way to get out the super weapon part of him cause if he didn't drum the world as we know it would cease to exist. WAY OFF TOPIC..........
Anyway Lars and Dave and Paul and Gene are not that far off in age and yet everyone far surpasses Lars. So basically what I'm getting at is Metallica would be better without Lars. I bet it was a breathe of fresh air for them when Joey Jordinson and Lombardo filled in for Lars. They probably did stuff Lars could never do.
Everyone else in the band seems to still have it. Or at least better then Lars. The drums are a special instrument in a band and they need to be approached as such.
Keep in mind this is just one way to look at it. There could be a ton of different things that could make this band shine again. They just need to figure it out. I don't even know why I care this much. In the time Metallica's been trying to save themselves tons of better bands have sprung up in their place. I think I'll go listen to some of them.
Member
52. writes:
I can see your point HR. At this point,i got a feeling they know excactly who they're playing for and why. Its probably good for folks who didnt see that MOP tour in 86 to see them perform those classics. They're certainly doing nothing off the Loads or St Anger albums. So they at least know what their bread and butter is. Z: good stuff as usual,with your unique humor thrown in for good measure. You would have to dig around,but H.Stern interviewed Lars back in Sept. and he admitted he wasnt a good drummer. That he had to take lessons between the Kill Em All album and Ride The Lightning. Imagine that huh? Hard to believe.
53. writes:
I think the best thing metallica could do, would be to aim small and do an EP or something. Maybe if they just put all their effort into 2 or 3 really good new songs maybe they could get some of their cred back. The always seem to try and reinvent the wheel with each new release. Why not just focus on a single song. As far as maiden being the best metal band of all time.....was there ever any doubt? All you CT folks out hang in there hopefully we will get power back soon.
Former Contributor
54. writes:
I defended their potential until "Death Magnetic". I'll always be a fan of the "RTL", "MOP", "...AJFA" and even "Black". I grew up with this band playing in the background. I treated "Load" as a mistep of the era, "Reload" as 'the remainder of those sessions' and "St. Anger" as some sort collective band-brain hemorrhage but my support for them is at an end. "Lulu" doesn't even upset me as it should.
Member
Member
56. writes:
About as brutally honest a review ive read Z. I actually knew after the half a song and snips of two others,its something my ears couldnt tolerate. The thing is getting scorched and ripped to shreds by all reviewers. Feel bad for the people who spent an hour and twenty minutes of thier life listening to it.
Member
57. writes:
I feel better for all the pre-orders haha. They spent their hard earned money for that atrocity. I so happy I didn't waste my time and money on this album. If I was Metallica I wouldn't give a sh!t what the label did I'd walk into the factory and destroy all those albums with my bare hands. I think the label released this album for the lawls.
Member
Member
61. writes:
What im wondering,is damage control,how to come back from this obvious atrocity. Metallicas mgt. team has its work cut out for themselves. You can pass it off as a side project all you want,but the brand names still on it. In my opinion,to get taken seriously,Metallica would have to record and release a masterpiece that falls between MOP and AJFA. Seriously cant see it happening. This Lulu project is what "artistic freedom" gets you. Wonder what Rolling Stone magazine rated this nightmare? Probably 5 stars out of 5. Fvcking truly sad and pathetic.
Member
Member
Member
Member
65. writes:
If they actually had artistic freedom they would not have released Lulu. They're almost like slaves that way, because Warner Bro. will release sh!t even if the artist isn't satisfied. I think that's been said already but it's the truth. You'd think Metallica would be on their own label with all the money they've made. But nope still locked into Warner Bro.
I just found this and can't understand why this is in existence.
http://www.montrealgazette.com/entertainment/Music+reviews+Reed+Metallica+Justin+Bieber+Brian+Wilson+Florence/5634621/story.html
Apparently someone over at this gazette gave Lulu a 5/5. I was stomped.
66. writes:
Metallica have for a long time NOT been a metal band. All the brutality and angst has left them.
Metallica is now a 'hard rock' band, and they're just making commercially successful hard rock music that is not too offensive for radio.
The days of Puppets, Ride The Lightning are well and truly gone now and Metallica would not know how to relive those days. $$$ has sucked the drive and desire to really make Hard/Heavy music again.
And really...how can you be angry when your bank accounts are bursting at the seams?
Writer, Reviewer
67. writes:
Post 62 - Rolling Stone's review called Metallica 'prog-metal maximists'.
I'm sorry, what? I've listened to all of Metallica's released records, and not one of them even hinted at progressive metal. Didn't Rolling Stone used to be relevent? Didn't they used to have a clue?? What the hell happened to those guys???
Supporter
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
80. writes:
Hahaha "Lulu makes RTL look like a demo" I think RTL's production is what makes it sound like a demo. Sounds like it was recorded in a rich kid's garage. But that doesn't mean it isn't a masterpiece (it is), and for once, I agree with reviews on this one. I notice a lot of people hate any new Metallica because they feel like their poor widdle expectations have been crushed, and they somehow blame that on the album, but I agree that this album is just tepid. When a band like Metallica get as old as they are, they like to get gimmicky, and start doing weird sh**, because talent can ojnly carry you so far, especially once it's gone, and you have to rely on being odd and eccentric, and hopefully you can sail on into cult stardom for the rest of your days, and I think Metallica is doing just more of that. Like S&M before it, it isn't anything that I JUDGE Metallica on, necessarily, but I will give Metallica all the space they need. As a fan, I owe them that, and not to let my own selfish bullsh** wants get in the way. They can do a split with Rancid and Dillinger Escape Plan for all I care. Might be the best thing they ever do. Hell, send em into the studio with Tom Waits. Who cares anymore. Either listen to it or don't. I hate how everyone says "I LOVE old metallica but I'm still a fan" NO YOU'RE NOT. You are NOT a diehard Metallica fan, because you'd be listening more and b****ing less, appreciating any step your favorite band would take, but all I ever see is people b****ing about what THEy want Metallica to sound like now. Like, just because you ERALLY REALLY like Master Of Puppets, they can go back into the studio and make another one. They already gave you ONE and you don't f***ing appreciate it, why would they even TRY to get close to that again? YOU ARE A FAN OF OLD METALLICA. Plain and simple.
Member
Member
83. writes:
Agreed with Cr4wf0rd, post80. RTL is a true masterpiece.
I think it's really a stunning album, considering they were all only around 20, 21 when they wrote it.
That album's got it all, from Fight Fire with Fire agression to Ktulu. I'm amazed at Ktulu. Many bands these days simply don't have the capability to write something like that.
Fast forward to 2011 and it's Lulu.
Going from Kill' em All and Ride the lightning to Lulu, You just have to ask:
What the f*** happened?
Member
84. writes:
Cr4wf0rd, the problem I have with the sh!t you said is that, bands like Megadeth, Slayer, Exodus, Testament, Destruction, and even Anthrax have far surpassed this band in terms of talent and stability. I don't care how much money Metallica made compared to the other bands because I'm pretty sure they've made more then all them combined but that still doesn't change the fact that all the bands I just named come up at around the same time and Metallica is the only band falling behind.
Even Anthrax came back with a triumphant return and they had way more sh!t goin' on with them then Metallica did. Look at the massive lineup changes they've gone through over the years and they're still goin' strong now.
I admit I'm not a die hard Metallica fan. I only like up to the black album, that's when they started pumping out sh** album after sh** album. That's also when Pantera showed up and stole the metal spotlight in the 90's as Metallica slowly decayed, cause if you think about it, Pantera was one of "the" 90's metal bands. Yes I know they started in the 80's but they didn't hit it big till the 90's. Anyway, off topic.
I understand they can do whatever the fvck they want but if I was in a really famous band and I found out I lost a big part of my fan base because I continuously put out bad albums, I'd start to wonder if maybe I'm going in the wrong direction, because I sh!t you not every single time I hear about Metallica it's always the same discussion until a guy like Cr4wf0rd comes in and says we should basically just stop. And yea I agree that we should just stop cause obviously Metallica is never going to take their fans advice and bring that energy back. Even if the album isn't thrash they don't have the energy they had. They're old and I believe they've just kept going for all the wrong reasons. They've become their own tribute band in my opinion.
I mean look at the track listing for the big four dvd. They only do like 3 songs that aren't on their first 5 albums. Because they know. They just fvckin' know and they won't do anything about it. It's almost depressing how big of a deal this can be to people. Even me. It's retarded that I'm taking time out of my life to talk about a band they'll never satisfy me musically anymore. It's a shame really........ I am very grateful for their first 5 albums and I'll always appreciate what they did for metal. But not anymore.
NP: Pantera - I'm Broken
Member
Member
86. writes:
^^ I can agree with most of that, but I don't think they are just incapable of having the same energy they used to have, I just think it's gone, and Megadeth Slayer and Anthrax are still going strong, yeah, but metallica's level of fame has given them these delusions of grandeur that the other 3 don't have. Mustaine may be c***y and arrogant, but at least he isn't delusional. And I think that's why I respect those bands more than I respect metallica. They are where they are because they stuck to their story all these years. Despite constant member changes, megadeth still continue to impress me, but metallica is like that goofy homeless guy that you keep looking at just to see what crazy sh** he's going to try to get away with next. I don't care what metallica does anymore. I'll always check it out at least once, but I won't necessarily like it. I always like new megadeth.
Supporter
Member
89. writes:
Cr4wf0rd, yea I totally get what you're gettin' at. It just sucks that they destroyed themselves. I just so glad I have bands like Megadeth and Testament so I never have to worry about this band ever again.
I almost hope 2012 is really the end of the world so I don't have to hear about this next album cause we'll all be dead. But nah I don't actually cause then I'd miss a bunch of awesome "not Metallica" albums. That'd be a bummer.
Member
Member
Member
To minimize comment spam/abuse, you cannot post comments on articles over a month old.
Member
1. TheRaper writes:
why even bother anymore? nobody cares, it'll sound like crap, what's the point?