Lamb Of God Enable "Sacrement" Remix
Band Photo: Lamb of God (?)
LAMB OF GOD have crossed the line… literally. The Grammy-nominated metal band are breaking down the smoke and mirrors and allowing - for the first time in music history - fans and professionals alike the revolutionary opportunity to produce and/or remix the entire Sacrament audio CD.
All of the studio audio tracks (guitar, vocals, drums and bass) from the entire Sacrament album have been isolated, separated and prepared for use by music fans everywhere in ANY Mac or PC, so it is very user-friendly.
Remix the album any way you want to hear it. More bass? Your call. Less drums? Your call. Dub remix? Your call. New vocals? Good luck!
Track and add your own effects, vocals, guitar, bass, drums, and anything else you can imagine! Isolate tracks to help learn or to play/sing along. Create your own new unique songs or loops by cutting apart, rearranging or mixing up tracks or even entire songs. The possibilities are endless and the tools are now in your hands.
Let your inner-producer shine! We dare you! Share your Lamb Of God creations online and check out the creative adventures of other new producers. You are the beginning of a revolution in music as we know it.
To hear samples of the release go to www.lambofgod.tv
Source: BW&BK
What's Next?
50 Comments on "Lamb Of God Enable 'Sacrement' Remix"
Member
9. writes:
CockfagTexasJingoJango can go f*** himself, Lamb Of God are insanely good, how are they a vague metal band? Your such a f***tard, go die man. LOG f***in' rules
Now Playing: Lamb Of God - Reqium
i don't care what anyone says, Sacrement is a kick-ass album along with all their others
Former Contributor
11. writes:
I wouldn't call Log insanely good but they hit the spot when their sound is called for.
NIN did this first but this is the first I've heard of a heavy band doing it. I like the idea, might even mess with it myself.
A few weeks ago I was actually thinking of a couple ways "Again We Rise" would sound better if mixed differntly.
Now Playing: Behold...The Arctopus - "Scepters" Instrumental song and album of the year for me.
Former Contributor
12. writes:
The files will probably be huge won't they? Cool idea anyway. Oh and RM? I've checked out some Skullgrid tracks on their myspace, awesome stuff - classic Arctopus but seems more focused than some of their previous efforts.
Now Playing: Electric Wizard - "Doomantia"
13. writes:
LoG is one of TWO bands that had different sounding vocals on every album. The only album where the vocals are like the ones on Sacrament is Ashes of the Wake. Every album before that has the same lead singer, but the vocals are different. Like he couldn't f***ing figure out how he was supposed to sing over that Slayer ripoff bullsh**. You know what other band has different vocals on every album?
Avenged Sevenfold.
LoG is the A7X of "heavy metal". And I use quotations because without Adler, LoG would be 100% garbage. And you can't EVEN try to tell me that Randy Blythe doesn't sound like the f***ing cookie monster. Even more so than Burton C. Bell. LoG is a sorry excuse for metal. But when the field is picked clean like it is, the fanboys will take whatever they can get their hands on.
14. writes:
The change in the vocals is obviously a progression from less to more technique. On burn the priest and gospel randy could not annunciate his words properly and this changed slightly on palaces and then reached its final form on ashes and sacrament. The vocals are not different on every album, randy has just had more experience and has become a better vocalist since their original. You cant tell me that the vocals on burn the priest and gospel are better than the new vocals. The old vocals were just randy screaming incoherently, now he has a technique. I will give you the vocals on redneck though, i dont know what he was thinking there.
And a slayer rip-off. Thats ridiculous. I am an huge fan of slayer and log and while there is a resemblance in the guitar at times, their styles are different and in no way similar enough to call log a rip-off. There is no other band that sounds like lamb of god, from the vocals, to the riffs, to the drumming. They are not a vague metal band, they are one of the most original bands to come out since pantera.
15. writes:
Yeah, they think that too. If they had tried any harder to BE the almighty Pantera on Sacrament, they might as well have named the album Sanselmo. And, as far as you further cementing my point goes, I feel he's just screaming incoherently on all LoG recordings. Only he's started growling more. And as far as being a slayer ripoff goes, I admit I may have been a little too quick to judge that. Slayer, by far, has more intelligent lyrics. LoG is the sh** on the bottom of Kerry King's shoe.
LoG isn't only a vague metal band, they're also pretty stereotypical and generic.
19. writes:
What? LoG lyrics are some of the best out there. Old slayer lyrics are on a tight race with LoG lyrics but LoG blows new slayer lyrics out of the water. Look up some lyrics from As the palaces burn. Its really good sh**. And theres nothing incoherent about the newer LoG vocals, if you can decipher most of the lyrics just by listening then its not incoherent. What do you like to listen to anyways Crawford?
And yes, kerry king is a bit overrated. Hanneman is the true genius behind slayer.
20. writes:
dude if you dont like lamb of god why did you read this why would you care and if they are so lame why are you wasting time posting and arguing with thier fans? you stupid f***ing idiot everything youve said a fan has contradicted you suck at life and when it comes you metal you obviously dont know sh** i mean everybody has opinions but the sh** you say is just retarted go f*** yourself....anyway i agree slayer is a bit overrated diablos was thier best i thought and lamb of god kicks everyones a$$ if you dissagree go f*** yourself ........."Pure American Metal"
Former Contributor
21. writes:
Diablos their best? You automatically lose. "they might as well have named the album Sanselmo." === Lol!
If you ask me their incoherent vocals on New American Gospel was original thing they had. They're not a bad band by any standards, but I just think they're a perfect case of a band trying to be everything to everyone, they want to be At The Gates as much as they want to be Pantera as much as they want to be the metalcore band they were, so we get it all slammed together (much like many bands today).
Now Playing: Watchtower - "Dangerous Toy"
Member
22. writes:
Sounds really cool, there could be some really cool songs come out of this. I thought sacrament was there worst of there albums, not at all bad, just the worst of their albums, i thought if they changed some stuff on some of the songs they would be amazing, so this could be great. I hope they dont mess up redneck, walk with me in hell, or blackened the cursed sun though, those were the three tracks i really liked.
Member
23. writes:
by the way i kind of agree with inhatredofme, and kind of with dethmonkee. Slayer has some good songs, but for the most part i dont like a lot of it. But i'm not the biggest thrash fan, i just dont like a lot of the high pitch vocals, not to well controlled notes that are fast but dont always sound good, the guitars sometimes feel overly distorted and to chaotic to sound good leaving too many un-needed frequencies, generic drumming (although slayer's drummer is definitely not a normal thrash drummer), and thrash bass usually doesnt play a large roll, although metallica has good bass, and so does dio in holy diver. Thrash can be really great at times but at other times i feel it's over rated, but thats just me, not attacking anyone, just an opinion. Plus most of what i'm saying are generalizations.
Now playing: Old Man Gloom - Rotten Primate
Member
Former Contributor
25. writes:
Theres a clear distinction between how technically skilled and how important a band are....
The Sex Pistols for example: Nothing flashy, rumor has it they were lacking in terms of live chops---but 30 years later they still resonate.
I would say LOG are more schooled with their instruments(Lombardo aside), and Blythe has more range vocally and lyrically than Araya...But LOG aren't doing anything that hasn't been done before and in some cases better.
It's really a taste and mood thing really, I found myself listening to more Slayer last year but this year and the year before I played a lot more Log.
Now Playing: Om - "Pilgrimage"
26. writes:
Hey, sorry for not liking LoG, but I came here to see how many people like this sh**. Plus I love flaming them and getting everyone upset.
It seems to me that the people I know that like LoG don't really know a lot of heavy metal bands. I agree with Cynic's "everything to everyone" comment. That's a perfect way to put it. They try to have so many different facets that they come off as lukewarm, and every single one of their releases sounds like they're trying way too hard.
Hey, at least I have my reasons. Usually, I'd post "LoG sux. Get over it." I think Slayer is pretty boring, and I have since I reached puberty. That's why it's such an affront that a band with a rhythm section so talented is trying to be this generation's Slayer. And actually, all of Slayer's albums since Reign have sounded the same. Uninspired, scatterbrained, and typecast. But unlike LoG, at least they're consistent.
Former Contributor
27. writes:
What about Seasons In The Abyss? I thought that had some great tracks. Slayer was partly an entry into extreme metal for me alongside Obituary. They still hold a pretty special place with me, every now and again I'll have a Slayer binge. Haha all this talks making one come on I think... I agree Adler is pretty talented, he was going to be the drummer for tech-supergroup Blotted Science but had to pull out.
Now Playing: Slayer - "Kill Again" (NO APARANT MOTIVE, KILL AND KILL AGAIN! Ahhh, classic)
28. writes:
south of heaven sounds nothing like seasons which sounds nothing like diabolus or ghua, which sounds nothing like christ illusion. The only thing thats "vague" is your definition of what is generic and what sounds the same.
I know a lot of heavy bands from thrash to black to death and LoG kicks all their asses. Of course this is an opinion, but im not gonna flame dude, so whatever floats your boat man.
29. writes:
CockfagTexasJingoJango really needs to shut the f*** up and go die, I'm not even going to bother arguing with him cuz hes obviously some flaming retard who can't acknowlege real metal. Like seriously man, you think Slayer and Lamb Of God are lame, what the f*** do you listen to?
Yu know whats actually a really kick-ass Slayer album, Show No Mercy dude, I never really listened to it that much untill recently but that is an awsome album, One of my new favorites.
Now Playing: Slayer - Black Magic - just learned this song too, its pretty fun to play
Supporter
30. writes:
log was one of my first heavy bands from gettin me outta the melodic thrash metal i was listening to and the classic nwbhm stuff and bridged me to melodic death metal, then straight up death metal, to brutal thrash, and now black metal
post 29 my fav. is Hell Awaits
Supporter
33. writes:
^^ Ummm. Divine Intervention, Christ Illusion, and Undisputed Attitude were all WORSE than Diabolus. I just don't see a reason that if you're going to be a metal fan, why cling onto the most typecast and passe bands? I agree, Hell Awaits is badass, and Seasons DOES have some good songs, but if you look deeper, the good songs on their albums are the only songs worth listening to. The other songs are just laughable. I'm not saying I don't like Slayer, so don't take it the wrong way, I just think that they're pretty tame by today's standards, and it's sad that bands emulate them when there's other bands that are way heavier in today's day and age. Arch Enemy. Vital Remains. There's two bands WAY heavier than LoG OR Slayer.
34. writes:
the black dahlia murder and job for a cowboy are both way heavier than lamb of god and all three are my favorite bands right now so what thats not the point...fine dont like lamb of god doesnt bother me i sh** think the sh** you talk about them is f***ed up....i think how tecnical and talented lamb of god is definatly sets them apart its not about being down tuned and playing really fast or being heavy all the time like nile i f***ing love nile but thats what they do and lamb of god do what they do anyway whatever dude like i said i dont care dont like lamb of god i just hate seeing them get bashed i know i will always f***in love them.....unless they go emo or some f***ed sh** like that lol "Pure American Metal"
Former Contributor
35. writes:
Eh I'd definately pick Divine Intervention over Diabolus. If you look at the reviews in the Metal Archives most others would too. Anyway yeah Seasons had some sh** tracks but like Christ Illusion it had some gems. I think "Cult" is one of the best songs they have.
And man, Christ, God almighty - why did you pick Arch Enemy?? Take away the vocalist and they're such a bland band, how a band with such mediocre riffs has become so super popular is beyond me! ... oh wait, teen boys oggling at a girl fronted metal band?
Now Playing: Cryptopsy - "Slit Your Guts"
36. writes:
You know, I agree with the notion that Arch Enemy is bland, but I never said they weren't. I just said they were HEAVIER than Slayer and LoG. And as far as that short blonde hag on vocals, there's WAY hotter chicks in metal. She only looks hot in band pics when she's got two pounds of makeup on. Therefore, Cynic, the "teen boys 'oggling' at a girl-fronted metal band" thing goes, nice try, but guess again.
And to asthepalacesburn1985, I hope the "1985" at the end of your username isn't the year you were born, because a twenty-two year old should possess better spelling skills, and should like bands better than Handjobs For Cowboys. It's actually been a real long time since I heard a band that ridiculous, and I'm a GWAR fan.
Member
Former Contributor
39. writes:
I like Arch Enemy, and not because they have a female vocalist. I don't really find her all that attractive even, and especially not when she sings like she does. I would say that Arch Enemy are popular because their songs are both catchy as well as heavy.
It's not always just about the riffs. Some of the best songs ever written have very simple, repetitive riffs.
Former Contributor
Member
42. writes:
Simple repetitive riffs, arent always so simple.
the "slayer binge" line out of context sounds pretty funny.
i dont like arch enemy that much but they have two songs i like, my apocalypse and we will rise. My apocalypse is really rhythmic with a cool break down, and we will rise isnt as good but the thing in her microphone makes her voice sound a bit cooler and the guitar is pretty good.
now playing: Rosetta - Lift Pt. 3
Supporter
43. writes:
"I just think that they're pretty tame by today's standards"
well no sh** man u think that after 2 decades that they r still gonna be the heaviest and fastest band around? someone is always gonna take it to the next level man
"Some of the best songs ever written have very simple, repetitive riffs"
agreed man just look at any ac/dc riff, Pantera's Walk, or Deep Purple's Smoke on the Water
I like Arch Enemy, u gotta admit that the Amott bros r actually pretty good guitarists anyway
44. writes:
I'd say Slayer stands up against a lot of bands today, especially Arch Enemy, the only thing about Arch Enemy thats more extreme than Slayer is the vocals, which aren't that great. Arch Enemy are pretty overrated if you ask me, I still like them but not worthy of all the hype in my opinion.
Lamb Of God is a lot better than Arch Enemy
46. writes:
The only thing unheavy about slayer is the vocals, like black widow says. Its the simple fact that screamed vocals are heavier than anything Araya is capable of doing. But, its not all about being heavy, is LoG heavy? yes. are they the heaviest out there? not by a long shot. But heaviness means nothing when you have sh** riffs, lame vocals, and uninventive drumming. Half the bands out there that try to be super heavy are just sh**. They down tune the sh** out of their guitars, play really fast uncreative riffs and load their music with senseless blast beats. Its not about how heavy you are, its about creating quality works of guitar, drums, and vocals. LoG isnt insanely heavy but they have some of the best riffs out there, same with slayer, and the drumming is a style thats not highly overplayed in the metal world.
48. writes:
i am 22 d***head and i stick by lamb of god and job for a cowboy i dont give a f*** they are both way f***ing better than arch enemy i saw them at ozzfest and the only thing they have going for them is angela isnt bad on the eyes and youd think for a band that was formed by michael amott it would be cool but no they suck and so do you.....carcass was bad f***ing a$$ though i must say
50. writes:
The day that Blowjob for a BoyToy is better than Arch Enemy is the day that the world ends. Even if you look at Arch Enemy as Carcass's shxt, LoG STILL can't get close enough to smell it. LoG is too juvenile. Carcass and Arch Enemy are the real f***in' thing. Don't get mad at me because the only songs you know by these bands are the ones that were on your Ozzfest /SOTU Sampler CD.
To minimize comment spam/abuse, you cannot post comments on articles over a month old.
Member
1. Vicarious_Intent writes:
Hey, that's actually really cool. I really wanna check this out.