70000 Tons of Metal - The World's Biggest Heavy Metal Cruise

"some music was meant to stay underground..."

Lars Ulrich Talks About New Metallica Album and More In Interview

Photo of Metallica

Band Photo: Metallica (?)

Britain's Metal Hammer magazine has recently conducted an exlusive interview with METALLICA drummer Lars Ulrich about the progress of the recording sessions for the group's new album, among other subjects. A few excerpts from the chat follow:

Metal Hammer: You've already recorded the drum, guitar and bass tracks for the new album, with the rest to be added some time in August.

Lars: "The backing tracks are done, yeah. But Rick [Rubin, producer] likes to keep things organic and work in a way that can be described as 'of the moment.' If we continue in August we should be done by October."

Metal Hammer: Rubin isn't known for being to giving with his time. What role has he played in the sessions?

Lars: "He's been there every single day so far. He's all about the big picture. He doesn't analyze things like drum tempos or tell James [Hetfield] to play something in F sharp. He's more about the feel: is everyone playing together? Rick's a vibe guy."

Metal Hammer: And is it okay for Rick to tell you something you've done sucks?

Lars: "Absolutely. And, believe me, he does. There's not a lot of gray with him. He really speaks his mind. Either something's great or something sucks."

Metal Hammer: How easy was it to can Bob Rock?

Lars: [Frowing]: "That's not a term I'd like to use. We'd been making records together for almost 20 years. That's as creative a relationship as you can come up with in music, film...just about anything. But it had got to a point where we would both finish each other's sentences. We needed to look somewhere else for our own sanity, survival and fulfillment."

Metal Hammer: How did you let him know that it was over?

Lars: "We talk on the phone a lot. That's the thing. I've said it many times: Bob has always been primarily a friend, and secondarily a producer. And that friendship hasn't suffered whatsoever."

Metal Hammer: In hiring Rubin, what were you hoping to achieve?

Lars: "To a certain extent, it was to do with wiping the slate clean when it came to the process of making records. I've known Rick for many years but we've never worked together. He brings a whole new energy and dynamic."

Metal Hammer: In keeping with the fact that you've been playing the title track of the "...And Justice for All" album again, Internet gossip suggests that some of these songs will be long ones.

Lars: "I wouldn't say that they're longer than the ones before. We've always written long songs. Most of the new ones clock between six and eight minutes. There's one that's five minutes. We're recording 14 and plan on finishing them all because we love them all. But only nine or ten will appear on the new record".

Metal Hammer: Kirk [Hammett] has said that although this is METALLICA's 11th studio album. It feels like the band's sixth. Does a part of you consider "St. Anger" was a mistake?

Lars: "Not at all. The mistake was the white leather jacket [worn in the drummer's infamous rock star phase, circa a stadiom tour with GUNS N' ROSES in 1992]. The Napster dispute wasn't a mistake, but it caught us off guard. The music has always been pure. It was the right thing to have done in 2003. That said, I listened to it a couple of months ago and it's a difficult record. I can hear that. But when I finished it, it made me do the same kind of backflips as all the other records."

Metal Hammer: You must've known that after the whole "Some Kind of Monster" thing, some people — including Kerry King [of SLAYER] who called you "fragile old men" — would never take the band seriously again.

Lars: "Oh listen, the reason we did that movie was to piss Kerry King off. Being the source of his amusement, that's great!"

Metal Hammer: As fascinating as it looked on screen, wouldn't it have been better to keep those things behind closed doors?

Lars: "There's certainly an argument for that. But right from day one, METALLICA has always been about the relationship with the fans. Unlike bands like LED ZEPPELIN who tried to keep things mystical, we've gone out of our way to be as accesible as possible. Our roots are alot more punk than that. 'Some Kind of Monster' was the logical conclusion of that mindset".

Metal Hammer: Then presumably you disagree with Kerry's ageist comments?

Lars: "Of course I do. If he hated 'Some Kind of Monster' that's the only stamp of approval that I need".

Metal Hammer: Nevertheless, "Some Kind of Monster" raised a lot of questions about your coheisiveness as a band. How are you all faring now?

Lars: "Of course, it asked some important questions. But you've got to remember that it was a moment in time from five years ago. Phil [Towle, therapist] is no longer around and we all get along. And mentioning Phil's name reminds me, he always used to tell us back then that the music we're making wouldn't shine through until the record after 'St. Anger'. I think he was right about that".

Metal Hammer: Not everyone approved of the new songs that you debuted earlier on the tour.

Lars: "Listen, what are we gonna do? Take a poll of the people that exit the venue? Stop playing them? I've just been on the METALLICA message board where a lot of moaning about all sorts of subjects goes on. But people are saying last night [Wembley stadium gig on July 8, 2007] was our best-ever appearance in the U.K."

Metal Hammer: Did the rumbling of fan discontent have anything to do with you dropping the new material out of the Wembley set?

Lars: "No, no...Not at all. We always try to play a different set every night. We played a new song in Donnington last year; we wanted to make the set as different as possible."

Metal Hammer: Do you consider this new album to be a thrash metal record?

Lars: "Oh [hang on] let me get my dictionary out...check my terminology."

Metal Hammer: Isn't that the record that the fans what you to make?

Lars: "I know that some of them do. But it's easier to tell you what it's not. It's not 'St. Anger' part two. This album has dynamics. It has slow bits; it has some very, very fast bits. It has melodic and very heavy bits. Rick is really focusing on James' vocals, but musically, it fucking rocks. So you might say that it falls into the category you just mentioned. But by the same token, anyone that follows this band will know, we always try to look forward and not back."

Metal Hammer: Does it feel like you owe anything to people who loved METALLICA in the early days but haven't liked too much of the band's music since the "Black Album?"

Lars: "Um, no. Not at all. I've a responsibility to my kids and to my lady to be a good partner. Also to myself, to create music that's honest, real and gets all three inches of my dick hard. Of course it's great to have as many people along for the ride as possibe. But when we put acoustic guitar into 'Fade To Black' 200 years ago, that's when the moaning started. We realized those people would always be around whatever we did. So, basically, we stopped trying to please them a long time ago."

Metal Hammer: When do you hope to release the album, and being touring properly?

Lars: "It'll be mixed by November and out in the new year. Maybe some time around February. In terms of playing live, we won't be quite as nutty as before. There won't be 39 dates in North Dakota. [laughs] I can't tell you that there will be an indoor arena tour in England. But things are going to be done in smaller increments. Instead of doing 14 arena gigs oveer 18 days, we'll do them in two legs of two weeks and then go home."

Metal Hammer: What you might call "doing less to do more?"

Lars: "Or taking longer to do the same. And that also applies to recording. People ask why it takes two years for METALLICA to make a record. We don't work 16-hour days in the studio for six days a week anymore. We work six-hour days in between dropping off our kids at school and picking them up again. The record still gets made, it just takes a bit longer."

Source: Blabbermouth

What's Next?


51 Comments on "Lars Talks About New Album and More In Interview"

Anonymous Reader

1. efleming writes:

I am sufficiently more intrigued about this album than I am with Down III. I'm not holding my breath though.

# Jul 31, 2007 @ 5:42 PM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Anonymous Reader

2. Stephen writes:

We made Some Kind of Monster to piss Kerry King off...

...And we made St. Anger to piss off everyone else.

# Jul 31, 2007 @ 5:57 PM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Anonymous Reader

3. dmasa writes:

lars should die hes not even good.

# Jul 31, 2007 @ 6:02 PM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Anonymous Reader

4. ace275 writes:

"But when we put acoustic guitar into 'Fade To Black' 200 years ago, that's when the moaning started. We realized those people would always be around whatever we did. So, basically, we stopped trying to please them a long time ago"

By the means of selling out

# Jul 31, 2007 @ 6:06 PM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Anonymous Reader

5. haha writes:

jeez...its seems every band has someone whos a retard. they need to get a new drummer.

# Jul 31, 2007 @ 6:51 PM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Jackrum's avatar

Supporter

6. Jackrum writes:

comment number 2..

exactly what i was going to write.

# Jul 31, 2007 @ 6:54 PM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Anonymous Reader

7. O-Matron writes:

Does anyone else feel tht the Interviewer at Metal Hammer seemed to ask alot of antagonistic questions? (at least based on the segment above).

# Jul 31, 2007 @ 7:09 PM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Diamond Oz's avatar

Senior News Correspondent

8. Diamond Oz writes:

It's because Metal Hammer sucks balls. I used to buy it but then realized it was just a huge waste of time and money.

# Jul 31, 2007 @ 7:13 PM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Anonymous Reader

9. Tatty writes:

Just a question off topic ...... Why does no one ever mention Garage Days Inc? It's the most neglected album of theirs....yet no one ever talks about it???? Why is that?

# Jul 31, 2007 @ 7:20 PM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Anonymous Reader

10. Southern Slumlord writes:

horrible drummer, horrible band, horrible magazine, why the F*** did I even glance at this.

# Jul 31, 2007 @ 7:24 PM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Anonymous Reader

11. Beefy T writes:

No one talks about garage days cause it's a cover album.

# Jul 31, 2007 @ 7:25 PM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Anonymous Reader

12. Tommy Tutone writes:

GOD you guys are f***ing stupid....yes, YOU guys.

# Jul 31, 2007 @ 7:28 PM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
RememberMetal?'s avatar

Former Contributor

13. RememberMetal? writes:

Take from this what you will, but it's a point of interest for me.

Lars: "Rick is really focusing on James' vocals."

If Rubin can tear James away from St. Anger lyrics and Load-forward "yeeeeaaah-woooah"s there is hope.

Now Playing: Type O Negative - "Green Man"

# Jul 31, 2007 @ 8:15 PM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Anonymous Reader

14. brandedcfh420 writes:

well, i dont see why james and lars just dont come out of the closet and admit to be being gay lovers....

# Jul 31, 2007 @ 8:31 PM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Anonymous Reader

15. brandedcfh420 writes:

Lars: "There's certainly an argument for that. But right from day one, METALLICA has always been about the relationship with the fans. Unlike bands like LED ZEPPELIN who tried to keep things mystical, we've gone out of our way to be as accesible as possible. Our roots are alot more punk than that. 'Some Kind of Monster' was the logical conclusion of that mindset".

YEA RIGHT B1TCH, THATS WHY U SUED NAPSTER....FUKING PILE OF DOG FECES..THATS WHAT LARS HAS BECOME....O AND JAMES'S FLUFFER......

# Jul 31, 2007 @ 8:35 PM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Anonymous Reader

16. ultradrummer writes:

nothings gayer than slayer

# Jul 31, 2007 @ 9:23 PM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Anonymous Reader

17. FocusShift writes:

There's so much contradiction in that interview, it's not even worth getting into it.

# Jul 31, 2007 @ 9:53 PM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Chupacabra_hunter's avatar

Supporter

18. Chupacabra_hunter writes:

Rob Halford is gayer than Slayer

# Aug 1, 2007 @ 12:38 AM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Cynic's avatar

Former Contributor

19. Cynic writes:

Damn it RM? - I had that "Rick is really focusing..." quote loaded up in my clipboard to whack in this post but you beat me too it! A good sign indeed.

And good point Diamond Oz, MH does indeed suck.

Now Playing: Entombed - "Living Dead"

# Aug 1, 2007 @ 1:34 AM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Jackrum's avatar

Supporter

20. Jackrum writes:

i only get metal hammer for the cds. if i want a decent magazine i'll find terrorizer.

Np Iron Maiden - Flight Of icarus

# Aug 1, 2007 @ 3:13 AM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Anonymous Reader

21. metallica fan writes:

u guys r the biggest DUM F#&KS ever cause metallica is the best metal band ever so shut the F#&K up

# Aug 1, 2007 @ 4:29 AM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Anonymous Reader

22. Mike writes:

Lars: "Um, no. Not at all. I've a responsibility to my kids and to my lady to be a good partner. Also to myself, to create music that's honest, real and gets all three inches of my d*** hard."

What?? Lars has got A d***?? Since when?? Ah, 3 inches.. ok then. nevermind

# Aug 1, 2007 @ 5:01 AM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Diamond Oz's avatar

Senior News Correspondent

23. Diamond Oz writes:

Meh Terrorizer's ok but seems to be made up of the kinda people that's all like "Yeah we're so underground! Everyone but us listens to sell out music! We only listen to Slayer's first demo and everything they did after that was sellout!"

# Aug 1, 2007 @ 6:35 AM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Jackrum's avatar

Supporter

24. Jackrum writes:

terrorizer can be like that.. but the cds are better than MH and kerrwank!! mag aint worht the paper its crayoned on to.
oh and metallica fan.... the word dumb has a B at the end of the word.. so that comment applies more to you than anyone else.

# Aug 1, 2007 @ 6:42 AM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Diamond Oz's avatar

Senior News Correspondent

25. Diamond Oz writes:

Oh god yeah Kerrwank! is the lowest of the low for magazines!

# Aug 1, 2007 @ 6:49 AM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Anonymous Reader

26. brandedcfh420 writes:

yo metallica fan...or should i say "selloutica sheep"...you can sit there and smacktalk all you want..we (or at least I) will still continue to talk mega sh1t on these has beens....and learn to spell proper english you illiterate "dumb f8ck"...did you fail k-5th grades or were you born that stupid....

after reading that interview, lars has only shown the true pile of sh1t he is...saying they wanted to reamin as accesible as possible to the fans...what a fuking lie that is...lars knows that SELLOUTICA is going to be flushed down the toilet very soon, and hes tryin to save face by talking these lies....

# Aug 1, 2007 @ 9:31 AM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Anonymous Reader

27. Kick Ass Duke writes:

I am also becoming slightly intrigued with this album. “Focus Shift” is right; there are just so many contradictions in this article to point out. There is however one thing I would like to point out. When Metal Hammer asks if he has a “responsibility” to the fans who like Metallica but don’t like anything after the Black album Lars says:

“Um, no. Not at all. I've a responsibility to my kids and to my lady to be a good partner.”

That’s so geigh, way to NOT answer the question. So you have no responsibility to the fans who made Metallica what they are today? You have no regret for making us suffer through Load, Reload, and St. Anger? That’s so lame. Sometimes Lars comes off like a complete tool.

Now Playing: Dream Theater – ITPOE 2

# Aug 1, 2007 @ 12:49 PM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Anonymous Reader

28. metal 2 death writes:

i dont really care if this album comes out. its probably gonna suck d*** like that one song. whoooooo a ooooo. but seriously as for all of the gay comments... lars and james are not the gay ones... kirk hammet is the gay one!

# Aug 1, 2007 @ 1:30 PM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Anonymous Reader

29. coldiem writes:

It is so funny to see people bash Lars for the Napster thing. People still don't get it. Music isn't free folks, get over it. Someone spent a lot of time and energy making it, and to some that is the way they make their living, so pay up. 15 years ago you either bought the album or you didn't f***ing hear it. The sooner you learn that nothing in life is free, the easier your life will be. The reason Metallica and others went after Napster is because it was basically endorsing stealing band's music and making it easy for everyone. Of course you will never stop piracy, but the whole point of the suit was to change people's minds, not change the way things are. I'm not saying I've never downloaded any music, we all have I'm sure, but I'm not saying that it is a good thing either. For me downloading music is a way to discover new bands, not rip off the ones I already know and like. People will argue the same for Napster, but if someone hadn't have stepped in when they did things would've got way out of hand.

Apparently Kick a$$ Duke doesn't understand the way the world works yet. Lars answered that question exactly as he should. The guy isn't on the earth to get up and make music for you. If you feel that way then you need to re-evaluate your way of thinking. He is a human being the same as you and me, and has his own life too. The guy has a family dude, that comes first. Always. No matter if you are a rock star or a clerk at a convenience store. What is lame, though, is bashing the guy for loving his family more than music. The only responsibility he owes to the fans is not showing up at a show too f***ed to play drums. As far as albums go, they put it out and you either like it or not. It isn't his fault if you don't like them. Why should he regret that? They are millions of other fans who like them just fine.

# Aug 1, 2007 @ 2:00 PM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Anonymous Reader

30. Kick Ass Duke writes:

Well since you took the time to single me out, I guess I should respond. My problem with Lars’s statement about “responsibility to the fans” is that he didn’t answer the question. The guy from Metal Hammer asked if he felt any responsibility to the fans in regards to the last few albums Metallica put out and he says he says he has a responsibility to his “kids and his lady”. What does that have to do with the music? Fine, he has a responsibility to his kids and his woman, I get that. It’s just that he refuses to take any responsibility for the musical direction Metallica has gone in. Load, Reload, and St. Anger are BY FAR the worst Metallica albums. Why won’t he just admit that? I would have much more respect for Lars if he would just come out and say “those albums sucked”.

Please explain to me why I “don’t understand how the world works”? Because my view on Metallica and Lars differs from your opinion I don’t “understand how the world works”? What does that even mean? I can firmly say that anything after the Black album was garbage. I'm sure that the majority of Metallica fans would agree.

# Aug 1, 2007 @ 2:54 PM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Anonymous Reader

31. O-Matron writes:

He did answer the question:

Metal Hammer: Does it feel like you owe anything to people who loved METALLICA in the early days but haven't liked too much of the band's music since the "Black Album?"

Lars: "Um, no. Not at all.

thats a pretty straight forward answer.

# Aug 1, 2007 @ 3:26 PM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Anonymous Reader

32. coldiem writes:

Well, I apologize if I misinterpreted your statements in the previous message. To me it sounded like as though you thought he was being lame by saying that his first responsibility was to his family and not to his fans. That is what my "world works" statement was directed at. However, I guess that is unfortunate reality of typed messages. You can't always understand exactly what somebody means based on the way they type their ideas into a message box.

I wouldn't say Lars was really avoiding the question of responsibility for his music. He goes on to explain about people moaning when they put acoustic guitars in Fade to Black. If he has a responsibility for his music, what is that responsibility? To make a thrash album? To not put certain things in the music? That's all pretty subjective, and up to the band themselves, not the fans. Something you would love to hear is something some other fan would hate. So if he is supposed to have a responsibility to his fans for his music, which fan is it?

And I don't think he should come out and say the albums sucked, the albums after all don't suck. They might suck in your image of a Metallica album, or what you expect from Metallica, but the albums on their own aren't that bad. It's all about the Metallica name being slapped on it, and people not taking the albums for what they are. Although I have to admit St. Anger was pushing it at times.

# Aug 1, 2007 @ 3:31 PM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Anonymous Reader

33. brandedcfh420 writes:

i love to see how people still want their super-heroes to come out of the "fires of desperate has beens"....if the cd kiks a$$, it does...if not, i was correct...

and sorry about the lars and james being gay line...i forgot to include kirk doggystyle in between the two of them getting it from both lars and james....

# Aug 1, 2007 @ 3:48 PM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Anonymous Reader

34. brandedcfh420 writes:

yo coldiem, you r incorrect about the napster thing....one of their songs got leaked from the inside and it was incomplete....instead of going after the person responsible for the leakage they went after napster....kinda cowardly, imo...why go after someone who wasnt responsible to begin with......??!!.....besides, lars stole the name metallica to begin with....PILE OF DONKEY SH1T LARS DIDNT LIKE SOMEONE DOING TO HIM WHAT HE DID TO SOMEONE ELSE!!!....PU$$Y A$$ B1TCH LARS.....AND LOOK AT THEM NOW...what jokes they are.....!!!!!!!!!!

# Aug 1, 2007 @ 5:08 PM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Anonymous Reader

35. coldiem writes:

It was actually a Madonna single that was leaked and that was her reason for getting on board in the Napster suit. A demo of Metallica's "I Disappear" was in fact leaked, but I find no mention of that being their reason for entering the suit. They entered into a lawsuit with Napster was because of Napster's refusal to make "And Justice for All" and "Nothing Else Matters" unavailable to its users. But thats just the legal bullsh**. Lars has said their reasoning was to "maintain control over their music", which most people see as "get off my piles of money." Either way, a band isn't going to file a lawsuit over a leaked demo. I was more talking about the overall picture, rather than any individual band or artist's reasoning for filing suit against Napster. In the end it was just to send a message to the public saying, "Stop stealing music, it isn't any different than stealing merchandise from a store, and you wouldn't do that, would you?" Most people were too ignorant to know that using Napster to download music was illegal.

# Aug 1, 2007 @ 5:39 PM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Cynic's avatar

Former Contributor

36. Cynic writes:

Well said, I don't see how you can be p***ed at them for wanting control over the music they create more than any other artist who's not giving it away for free. Metallica have more than once out of their own pocket come back to do dates they've missed because of illness or other, what, they;'re guilty of being rich? Grow up and accept it.

Now Playing: Emperor - "Wrath Of The Tyrant"

# Aug 1, 2007 @ 6:35 PM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Anonymous Reader

37. Deathbringer's Mom writes:

Metallica is just like me. They haved sucked 50 d***s in a row in counting as well as licking a few unwashed a$$holes!

# Aug 1, 2007 @ 7:14 PM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Anonymous Reader

38. metal lord shorty writes:

we will see metallica we will see just kinda get the feeling they talkin it up a bit to much

# Aug 6, 2007 @ 7:33 AM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Anonymous Reader

39. brandedcfh420 writes:

^^^^^^ thats all selloutica does now is talk, talk, talk.....

# Aug 6, 2007 @ 8:35 AM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Anonymous Reader

40. Derek writes:

The BC Lions Kick Ass. So does Metallica, they aren't sellouts, they just got too big to care what the "skinny, greasy-haired mullet in the jean jacket" really thinks of their new albums. Get out of your Camero and in to the 21st century. The new Metallica CD will rock. Period.

# Aug 10, 2007 @ 1:29 AM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Anonymous Reader

41. brandedcfh420 writes:

^^^^ shaved head here...dont own a vehicle and am glad to be living in the 21st century....AND STILL TALKING SMACK ABOUT SELLOUTICA, PUKETALLICA, SH1TALLICA, MONEY HUNGRY WHORETALLICA, LIARTALLICA...YOU PEOPLE NEED TO LET THESE HAS BEENS SLIP INTO HISTORY...THEY HAVE DONE EVERYTHING THEY CAN TO FUK OVER THE FANS THAT MADE THEM WHO THEY "WERE"...THEY WERE ONCE THE GREATEST BAND ALIVE...NOW THEY ARE THE LAUGHING JOKES OF METAL, AS FAR AS IM CONCERNED....

# Aug 10, 2007 @ 8:12 AM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Anonymous Reader

42. Dtrompstine writes:

The point is that they wrote there new albums specifically to MAKE MONEY not to release music that they think is good. In the space of a few years your entire musical perspective doesn’t change, however the music that was selling did. For this reason they can be better described as marketers than musicians, if all of a sudden Jazz became popular you can bet that sh**allica would be the first to release a Jazz album. Basically they have no morals, no pride in there music or themselves and do not give a sh** about the people that made them big in the first place, to quote a real metal man “you didn’t make metal buddy, metal made you”.

# Aug 11, 2007 @ 7:17 AM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Anonymous Reader

43. relentless austin writes:

you didn't make metal, metal made you?!?! huh? are you serious? what planet do you live on dude? that's just plain ingnorant.
thanks dude, i think we're all now a little retarded now having read that.
somebodies musical perspective isn't your place to determine. not everybody is so one dimensional. why over analyze what is so obvious? those guys got bored with "thrash" years ago. f***ing deal with it already!

# Aug 11, 2007 @ 10:25 AM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Anonymous Reader

44. Dtrompstine writes:

the point is that peoples music changes slowly, it isn't just totaly different all of a sudden. What had changed quickly is what was selling CD's as such it isn't a huge leap to suggest that they were writing music with the main intention to make money not to realease good music. And just as a side point i don't really like any of there music that much so i really don't care what they choose to release. Also Metal did make them, they act as if they were the inventors, the only ones to influence the genre, however this is not the case and if is hadn't been for metal they would never have amounted to anything.

# Aug 11, 2007 @ 12:47 PM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Anonymous Reader

45. relentless austin writes:

no dude, i understand your point, but i gotta call bullsh** on that. history gives them credit, they refer to themselves as just four fans that got lucky. those guys probably just get sick of the first questions are comparing new work to past work.
i don't think anybody in their right mind would give metallica complete credit for metal. that's nonsense, but to not give them ANY credit after writing albums like RTL and MOP is just retarded.
also, what seems like sudden changes to the fans are not sudden changes to them. they were doing like 250 shows a year for ten years before the black album! do you have any idea what thats like? have you been on tour? i have...nowhere near 250 shows in a year, but it's bad a$$ and grueling as hell at the same time. maybe when all you see is the record come out, and the one concert in your town it doesn 't look like much. you get burnt out though...seriously! after four groundbreaking albums, and bringing thrash to the people, i think they paid their dues enough to do whatever the f*** they want to do! and after giving us all those classic tunes, a lot of you guys want them to come out and say Yeah, we suck! We used to be cool, but then we said f*** it, i just want money and that's it. even if that is the case...whatever.

# Aug 11, 2007 @ 2:48 PM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
RememberMetal?'s avatar

Former Contributor

46. RememberMetal? writes:

Damn straight Cynic.

Regarding post 36
I was at Summer Sanitarium in 2000(sneaking beers and not quite 21) It was 10,000 degrees celsius and rumors were all over the venue about James having had a "jet ski accident"....

Thats what it was called anyway.

So, Jason Newsted, John Davis (Korn), Kid Rock, Serj and Darron(SOAD) filled in on One, Mastertarium, Whiplash and Seek and Destroy among lots of other odd songs from the other bands.
I thought it was noble effort. Lot of energy to boot which surprised me.

Best part: They came back w/James (free admission with the ticket)to Lexington for two dates and played a proper show for 2 nights and were fantastic. 2 great concerts for the price of one.

Metallica have said and done some things I could have lived without, but that was something few bands of any magnitude would/could do.

Now Playing: Porcupine Tree - "Tinto Brass"

# Aug 11, 2007 @ 5:00 PM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Anonymous Reader

47. Dtrompstine writes:

relentless austin - i never said they should come out and admit they are sh**, that’s stupid, no band should or will ever do that. but i think my point is still valid and is shown even more by St Anger, if they were burnt out and totally over thrash, why when the album sales started to dwindle. Did they try to release another thrash album? In this case the fact that it is a totally s**t album has nothing to do with anything, the point is, it is highly unlikely that they just happened to get burnt out at the exact same time as the mainstream public stopped listening to metal and then they just felt like releasing another thrash album as the mainstream public started to get back into heavy music, if that isn’t a calculated money making plan then it is one of the biggest coincidences in music. Maybe money is all music is about these days and i shouldn't be surprised but none the less i find it disappointing. Also, i totally agree that Metallica can release what ever the f**k they wont and i don't really think they owe fans anything as you said the fans got 10 years of hardcore thrash shows, and if you like there new stuff good for you. But i still feel that it is sad that there music didn't just naturally progress and that it detracts from them as musicians. If you are a total fan, then you can think of an explanation for anything, but I think the evidence is there for all to see.

# Aug 11, 2007 @ 9:54 PM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Anonymous Reader

48. Fuck Moderated Comments writes:

At least they never released a disco album.
>;:( [wags angry finger at Kiss]
Just want to point out, whatever you think of Metallica today, they were still one of the great thrash gods of the 80's, besides Slayer and Pantera, of couse, whom I all humbly applaude. (is that how you spell applaude? it just looks wrong to me).

# Aug 12, 2007 @ 1:00 AM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Anonymous Reader

49. Fuck Moderated Comments writes:

The >:;( was supposed to be an angry face. Lmao no idea what happened there.

# Aug 12, 2007 @ 1:02 AM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Anonymous Reader

50. relentless austin writes:

ok man...cool. i think you're putting a bit too much emphasis on timing though.
another way to look at it is that it took years of playing the rock star game to see that they lost their way. artists have a need to experiment, and push their own boundaries as artists.
honestly, that's why i still believe in metallica. yeah, they strayed from thrash for years, either because of burn out or because the competition went away. either way, have respect for them. hetfield is still the best f***ing metal rhythm guitarist out there...hands down! kirk i think still has it. lars i will admit seems to have gotten pretty lazy though. trujillo...that dude is an all around bad ass! AND they finally got smart and let go of bob rock for rick rubin...bout f***ing time!
keep the faith

# Aug 12, 2007 @ 1:56 AM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
VO's avatar

Supporter

51. VO writes:

This is a PRE RELEASE INTERVIEW!! It doesn't really mater what was aksed or how it was answered. 85% of the comments above are silly stupid chatter!! Metallica has changed dummies!! Not always for the worse and some argue not for the better, but who made any of you chief metallihater? It's a band! A band that will release another album in 2008. Just because your greasy killem all Metallica don't exist anymore does not give any of you the right to be bychin and hatin or how they do business in 2007! They let ua all in a little closer with the documentary, and that sucked to some because you found out they got more going on than getting on stage and playing...Well dopes You also found out they have families the have created and must be concerned with!! Lars has damn good taste in fine artwork...didin't he haul like ten million at the auction? We go to see a lot more than we had seen. Even Dave Mustain crying about the old days was interesting. As far as Kerry King...he's in Slayer and the huge difference in the two is the can't play a set list that would ever compete with Metallica..Never. THE MUSIC IS THE MOST IMPORTANT THING. MUSICALLY WE'VE HAD MORE TO SMILE ABOUT WITH METALLICA THAN SOME OF THE OTHER BANDS WHO CAME OUT WHEN THEY DID. SAY WHAT U WILL, I KNOW IT'S GOING TO BE STUPID AND FULL OF HATE...BUT METALLICA CAN STILL HOLD THERE OWN. Sorry to disappoint you, but facts are facts..some of you still whining about Napster..It was fukkin online business!! File sharing sucks anyway!! Buy your tunes...Lars was completelty justified!! Why would you allow anyone to pimp your goods and didin't even ask you if it was cool? My only gripe is I agree they really need to get this new material out before years end instead of the propossed 2008 date. The music will have the last word. And stop saying Load and Reload Sucked....if for production quality alone they're woth the money...this band has stummble sure..BUT THE HAVE NOT FALLEN!! Haters..STFU!!!!

# Aug 20, 2007 @ 9:33 PM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address

To minimize comment spam/abuse, you cannot post comments on articles over a month old.