"some music was meant to stay underground..."

Headline News

Study Finds Music Sharing Doesn't Kill Sales

Finally some fuel against the blanket claims of the RIAA, [failed] retailers (e.g. Tower Records) and record labels - a study that finds that file sharing has little effect on CD sales. This study was the most detailed economic modeling survey to use data obtained directly from file-sharing networks thus far.

For the study, released Monday, researchers at Harvard University and the University of North Carolina tracked music downloads over 17 weeks in 2002, matching data on file transfers with actual market performance of the songs and albums being downloaded. Even high levels of file-swapping seemed to translate into an effect on album sales that was "statistically indistinguishable from zero," they wrote.

"We find that file sharing has only had a limited effect on record sales," the study's authors wrote. "While downloads occur on a vast scale, most users are likely individuals who would not have bought the album even in the absence of file sharing."

Even in the most pessimistic version of their model, they found that it would take about 5,000 downloads to displace sales of just one physical CD, the authors wrote. Despite the huge scale of downloading worldwide, that would be only a tiny contribution to the overall slide in album sales over the past several years, they said.

Moreover, their data seemed to show that downloads could even have a slight positive effect on the sales of the top albums, the researchers said.

The study is unlikely to be the last word on the issue. Previous studies have been released showing that file sharing had both positive and negative effects on music sales.

The Recording Industry Association of America was quick to dismiss the results as inconsistent with earlier findings. RIAA spokeswoman Amy Weiss wrapped up a statement with this, which says it all to me: "Our own surveys show that those who are downloading more are buying less."

What's Next?

Please share this article if you found it interesting.


5 Comments on "Study Finds Music Sharing Doesn't Kill Sales"

Post your comments and discuss the article below! (no login required)

Anonymous Reader
1. ah_shitz writes:

um yay? people are going to be downloading forever i mean come on now

# Apr 2, 2004 @ 9:41 PM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Anonymous Reader
2. burn_me!!! writes:

I downloaded an mp3 of disturbed's PRAYER, i liked it so much and found two other songs namely LIBERATE and REMEMBER...guess what...I decided to buy myself disturbed's second ALBUM...is this testimonial gona be included in the stats?calling RIAA.....

# Apr 3, 2004 @ 1:28 AM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Anonymous Reader
3. X fordirelifesake X writes:

I only download stuff that I would never buy or I'll download mp3s when I'm checking out a band that I just hearded about and most of the time I end up buying CD's from them later.

# Apr 4, 2004 @ 11:52 PM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Anonymous Reader
4. writes:

Like metallica i dled black album reload n load bcz theose suck a$$ but i bought ride the lightning ..and justice and so on bcz there first 4 were good

# Apr 5, 2004 @ 1:13 PM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Anonymous Reader
5. bonescraper writes:

i'm listening to fear factorys new song cyberwaste. i mean i was going to buy the record whether i listened to it or not but it gives me even a greater sense to buy the record, not download it like some poor fag that cant afford to spend $13.99. i like listening ton the internet but not downloading.

# Apr 5, 2004 @ 4:17 PM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address

To minimize comment spam/abuse, you cannot post comments on articles over a month old. Please check the sidebar to the right or the related band pages for recent related news articles.