"some music was meant to stay underground..."

Alice In Chains Readying First New Album In 13 Years

Alice In Chains, having not released a full length studio album of original material since 1995's self titled album, are working hard in the studio to have the record done by the end of 2008. Although the band did record a few songs that were released on their box set Music Bank in 1999, "Alice In Chains" was the final album with original vocalist Layne Staley, who died of a drug overdose in 2002. The band has since reunited with new vocalist, William DuVall who toured with Alice In Chains on their reunion tour.

Ultimate-Guitar.com recently caught up with Jerry Cantrell to get his thoughts on choosing DuVall to fill the immensely huge shoes of Layne Staley and where they are at with completing the new album. You can check out the video here.

Jerry Cantrell's comment on the upcoming album:

"We just kind of met and got along you know and ended up playing together on my solo tour and when we started thinking about doing some playing I suggested him coming in and jamming with us and the guys had a good time with him. That was like three years ago and we're still hanging out and having a good time and making some music. We're in the middle. Yeah, we're in the middle."

Alice In Chains have sold more than 14 million albums in the United States, released two number-one albums and 19 top 40 singles, and have received six Grammy nominations. As of press time the band doesn't have any tour dates for 2008 as they continue to work hard putting the finishing touches on the new material.

Source: Ultimate Guitar

What's Next?

Please share this article if you found it interesting.

Share this article!

You can get related band news and info in the sidebar and on the respective band pages.


30 Comments on "Alice In Chains Readying First Album In 13 Years"

Post your comments and discuss the article below! (no login required)

Anonymous Reader
1. M writes:

Nah this doesnt feel right, I fuken wish bands would respect their members who have died, especially ones as integral as Layne. AIC should change thier name.

# Jul 15, 2008 @ 3:55 AM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Anonymous Reader
2. Jamez writes:

I agree 100%, M. I don't understand why this 'project' needs to be called AIC. Of course it's great to see those guys together with a new singer, I actually look forward to the album, but AIC just doesn't exist without Layne. Not to me, at least.

# Jul 15, 2008 @ 5:07 AM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Anonymous Reader
3. M (Matt) writes:

I was gooing to say that. Laynes voice is what made that band stand apart from the crowd. Are they doing it for the cash?

# Jul 15, 2008 @ 5:32 AM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Anonymous Reader
4. Bobford Jones writes:

Look i agree Layne being the front man was a very important member but your forgetting the rest of the band, 1 has unfortunatley gone but what about the remaining members? They have every right to pick up where they left off plus those super awesome riffs and great backing vocals were all or mostly Jerry baby so id say if ya still got Jerry you still have the band.....

# Jul 15, 2008 @ 5:57 AM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Anonymous Reader
5. Cisne Negro writes:

I agree the first three comments. What´s so bad about changing the name? They´re not the same, so let´s change it. I like Cantrell solo albums, he doesnt pretend to be AIC; so why no to pick up some other name for the band with new lead vocals?

# Jul 15, 2008 @ 6:27 AM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
deathbringer's avatar

Founder, owner & programmer

6. deathbringer writes:

I don't think there's any reason they would HAVE to change their name. It's not like Sepultura where most of the original band is gone. I agree that it will not be the same as old Alice In Chains, but look at all the bands who have gone on to produce quality stuff after losing a band member or changing band members. Whether or not a band member died or left makes little difference to the actual argument, to which there is little logic anyway.

Sure, fans may be disappointed in the new stuff, but some may like it as well. Hell, Jerry Cantrell's solo material might as well be AIC it sounds so similar, so AIC with a new singer will still be AIC - just a new incarnation.

# Jul 15, 2008 @ 9:13 AM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Anonymous Reader
7. In2thepit writes:

Deathbringer I think that ends everyone's argument lol Nice job

# Jul 15, 2008 @ 9:29 AM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Anonymous Reader
8. Jamez writes:

Okay, a fair point. Perhaps the only way they Can justify using AIC name is the fact that Jerry did lots of the singing with AIC. But, you cannot really compare AIC with Sepultura. If you'd replaced Max with Phil Anselmo, people would have said 'hmm, Max sounds a bit different'. Try to replace Layne with Anselmo, forget it, it doesn't sound anywhere close to the AIC we know. Anyway, whatever. This is all blah blah blah. Still, to me, no Layne, no AIC. Just my view. Period.

# Jul 15, 2008 @ 10:23 AM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Pursuit_Of_Vikings's avatar

Member

9. Pursuit_Of_Vikings writes:

But Anselmo isn't singing for AIC...
I saw them live in fall '06 and the singer they have did a damn good job. And he had a sweet fro.

NP: Dr. Dre - "f*** Wit Dre Day (And Everybody's Celebratin')

# Jul 15, 2008 @ 1:54 PM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Kalis_wrath's avatar

Member

10. Kalis_wrath writes:

I agree with James and Matt whole heartedly! If I was Jerry Cantrell I would change the name. It almost seems that money is the reason they keep the name. Its sad to me because Jerry is an incredable musician who even on his solo gig did well! Is he trying to hang on to the A.I.C legacy like Layne never died? Or is it the money A.I.C brings to the table?

# Jul 15, 2008 @ 4:00 PM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Anonymous Reader
11. Westfallen writes:

F all that. Jerry is and always was the heart of AIC, and wrote most (and the best) of the songs. Even his solo records bleed soul...and he did all the vocals. The band retains all rights to the band name, in my opinion.

# Jul 15, 2008 @ 11:06 PM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Anonymous Reader
12. wombstretcher writes:

Why in the hell should they change their name? I love Alice in Chains, always have, always will. And as amazing of a voice Layne had, Jerry is the heart and soul of that band. Did AC/DC change their name when Bon Scott died? Hell No. And they came out with one of the best albums of all time after Bon's death. Who knows, this might be AIC's best album ever.
Give Peace A Chance.....

# Jul 16, 2008 @ 2:27 AM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Kalis_wrath's avatar

Member

13. Kalis_wrath writes:

Didnt Bon Scott only do one or two AC/DC albums? Layne did manny A.I.C albums and was a huge part in putting A.I.C on the map.

# Jul 16, 2008 @ 3:01 AM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Anonymous Reader
14. Jimie writes:

Like Jimi Hendrix Experience without Jimi. Pretty cool

# Jul 16, 2008 @ 7:04 AM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
BoltThrower's avatar

Member

15. BoltThrower writes:

Not a big fan of Alice In Chains new or old, but I think you might as well keep the name since any new name will always be followed with "formerly Alice In Chains" or "remaining members of Alice In Chains." All fans of old Alice In Chains know Layne is dead anyway and can move on if they don't think new Alice In Chains is worth anything without him.

# Jul 16, 2008 @ 8:41 AM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Anonymous Reader
16. rutz writes:

is the singer the guy who was on the heart special on vh1 classic? he sucked. and badly. i can see not getting a carbon copy of layne but get a guy who can at least pull the songs off.

# Jul 16, 2008 @ 6:05 PM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Txmetalhead's avatar

Member

17. Txmetalhead writes:

Great news! I don't know the singer did a pretty good job. Of course, he can't replace Layne Staley - no one can. I like Alice In Chains...but I loved Soundgarden a lot more.

# Jul 16, 2008 @ 6:58 PM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Kalis_wrath's avatar

Member

18. Kalis_wrath writes:

TX! YOU JOINED UP FINNALY! Congrats man! You are now a "Member" too! *LOL* ;)

Soungarden was great too. To be honest I love both just the same.

# Jul 16, 2008 @ 7:44 PM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Anonymous Reader
19. Jenny writes:

I agree with posts 4 and 6 101% Yes, the band will never be the same, but lets not 4get: many bands have lost a band member or band members and didn't have to make any harmful changes, so get over it. If you wanna stay and listen to the new material, go for it; if u don't, then don't. Think of it this way, Layne wouldn't want the band to change OR quit just b-cuz he's not around. RIP LAYNE STALEY.

# Jul 18, 2008 @ 8:15 PM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Anonymous Reader
20. Toughguy writes:

Bullsh**...there is no AIC without Layne, plain and simple there is no arguing it. Change the name.

# Jul 18, 2008 @ 8:25 PM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Kalis_wrath's avatar

Member

21. Kalis_wrath writes:

Has anyone ever heard an explanation from Jerry as to why he has not changed the name? I am very coreiouse as to his reasoning. The only thing that would make sence is if Layne at some point said to Jerry or had it in his will that he wanted it this way. Other wise, to me it seems like dis-respecting the dead in a big way.

# Jul 18, 2008 @ 9:13 PM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Kalis_wrath's avatar

Member

22. Kalis_wrath writes:

couriouse*

# Jul 18, 2008 @ 9:15 PM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Anonymous Reader
23. November Hotel writes:

Layne didn't define AIC. They all did... And they shouldn't have to change the name because Layne is gone. This argument is ridiculous.

# Jul 21, 2008 @ 12:07 PM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Anonymous Reader
24. currie64 writes:

to answer the ACDC Bonscott thing he sang on 7 studio albums.

# Jul 26, 2008 @ 2:12 PM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
ugly-bob's avatar

Member

25. ugly-bob writes:

im just looking forward to hearing what they will produce. its been a long long time.

bring it on i say

# Aug 7, 2008 @ 4:29 AM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
Anonymous Reader
26. Jamez writes:

Agreed 100%. I certainly look forward to hear the album. OK, AIC, then. So be it. But, The Stones wouldn't be the Stones without Jagger of Richards. Or Sepultura continuing without the Cavalera's (????). Oh well... let's hear the music

# Aug 7, 2008 @ 8:07 AM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
cruor's avatar

Member

27. cruor writes:

I dont understand the whole change the name because Layne isnt their. This isn't just Layne's band its Jerry's also and if he wants to keep the name then why not? Their are many bands that can be argued should change their name (eg Napalm Death, Finntroll, Deicide, Gorgoroth, Sepultura) but that is because most bands try to make money off of someone elses band when the founding members arnt there anymore. Jerry is a founding member and it is his band now so he can do what he wants with it.

# Aug 7, 2008 @ 10:54 AM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
JoO's avatar

Member

28. JoO writes:

sigh........no no this is not AIC this is the remaining members with some dude filling in. Sorry

# Aug 7, 2008 @ 5:34 PM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
cruor's avatar

Member

29. cruor writes:

No this is a new incarnation of Alice In Chains. As long as Jerry is in the band than it is AIC.

# Aug 8, 2008 @ 3:57 AM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address
ugly-bob's avatar

Member

30. ugly-bob writes:

it should have been the same situation with drowning pool after dave williams died. their sound completely changed yet they stuck with the original name. granted williams only recorded one album with them but the point still stands. what point is that? i have no idea....where am i?

# Aug 14, 2008 @ 7:39 PM ET | IP Logged Reveal posts originating from the same IP address

To minimize comment spam/abuse, you cannot post comments on articles over a month old. Please check the sidebar to the right or the related band pages for recent related news articles.

 

Metal Blog Directory